Bexar County Dems: A Party at War

Felix,

Can we say that Bexar Democrats are a reflection of Texas democrats?  If they are – we will be seeing a lot of red in 2012.  What a sham and shame that Bexar County Democrats idea of exercising political power came at the sacrifice of one of their own.

I hope that no other county party behaves in such manner.

Anyway, you would think that a Democrat in leadership role would use some common sense when criticizing a fellow democrat, especially in a public domain since they already have a bad image…no need to expand on that topic.  You may recall that there was opposition to Ramos forced removal, but unfortunately his supporters were not given equal media coverage, or equal voice, but this is San Antonio, you know how that goes. However, just when I thought Bexar democrats had satisfied their lust for power, imagine my chagrin at reading comments by an SDEC member.

I finally encounter a democrat exercising his freedom in support Ramos and in support of our democratic process. He makes this bold statement…

“I believe that any future correspondence or communication regarding BCDP, should be signed or sent out by Dan Ramos, who is the duly-elected (by 60% of Bexar County Voters) BCDP Chair, to counter the misleading information citing Choco Meza as “Chair” and to avoid any further confusion.  This is especially true regarding any letters sent out to the Secretary of State, Attorney General or to Jackie Callanen.

The LAW is THE LAW.   Neither Nelson Wolff, who is only a county judge and NOT a Supreme Court Justice, nor anybody else, has the authority issue any “orders” setting aside the votes of an official election – nor should they place themselves above the law.”

BCDP’s insane approach to address Ramos comments was just that “insane.” I forgot what Ramos said, but I recall all the comments and letters written to oust Ramos, even to extent of criticizing his appearance and intelligence. It was a long reach for power and it worked. It would be nice if the power they were reaching for actually did some good, but not the case as Texas voters have yet to elect a Democrat statewide. I attended some of the meetings prior to lynching Ramos and they were just that…lynching parties…like in the old days….way back…

And from what I understood there was no precedence in this case, hence why emotions ran high and logic and order were no where to be found.

Political incorrectness, however seems to pervade democratic halls…read on. These are a couple of responses to the statement above.

From: NovaCamp 

To: “B Shvetz” <

Date: Saturday, July 30, 2011, 8:20 PM

No body is listening to you losers. Look at your pathetic web site. Morons. 

“Losers” “Morons” These individuals are part of the same organization. What does the website have to do with anything? 

From: B Shvetz

“Nova Camp who sent a hate email to me …”

To: Don’t step on my freedom of speech…

 Obviously, these ranting are due to the division caused by the removal of Ramos, which continues to smell of foul play. Nevertheless, the BCDP’s scandalous  behavior has surpassed anything Ramos said…

Comments made by another SDEC member were just as disturbing. BD shout intolerance yet they too are intolerant to the point of daring to silence the voice of opposition.

“You are beganing to sound like that loudmouth and very vulgar Dan Ramos formerly the Bexar County Chair till we took a stand and ousted him. If you want to build any type of following you need to temper your speech. I doubt I would support you.” Ralph Galvan SD 26 committeeman

This Nova Camp individual is a member of the BCDP and SDEC .  Why is this representative for Texas Democrats making such comments to other democrats who are simply exercising their freedoms in supporting Ramos? 

Choco Meza was conveniently “elected” by party members, many of which were newly appointed precinct chairs. However, Ramos was voted in by popular vote, even though Meza had support from many of the local elected democratic officials, SHE LOST! I guess it was not easy to eat that slice of humble pie. I guess Bexar Dems were going to get their person in one way or another.

It baffles the mind that many democrats found Ramos comments distasteful, but many of those same democrats are in perfect agreement with name calling,  bullying, and directing hateful comments at Dan Ramos and his supporters.  Come on, two wrongs do not make a right. 

This is a case for the pot calling the kettle black. It’s not OK for Ramos to make comments about special interest groups shoving their agenda down the throats of voters, party members and such, but it QUITE ACCEPTABLE!  for democrats to heave deragatory comments on Ramos and his supporters.  Again, I guess Bexar Dems are like the preachers that don’t practice what they preach.

Oh and this just in: Boyd Richie made a remark that stunned a lot of folks who believed that the Bill White campaign was directed to some degree by Boyd. He told us that he thought it both dumb and wrong for Bill White to have run a Republican Lite campaign and not support the down ticket candidates. Richie said he had no control and little input. He also said that he has been upset for sometime with the DNC finance folks who call Texas donors and tell them not to contribute to the TDP.

So, why is the DNC supporting/endorsing Hinojosa for party chair? Why is the BCDP on a quest to silence the democratic voice?  Whatever these politiqeros are cooking up, it does not look like anything Texas Democrats should bite into..but that’s just my opinion.

What do you think? Are you ready to run for governor again? I think you should.

It’s all about values

I believe that if you sit democrats and republicans side by side and had an honest conversation with both of them you would find out that they have much in common. You would find out that both want the best education for their children.  If you asked them if they supported abortion on demand they would both be opposed. Likewise, if you asked them under what circumstances they supported abortion they would both reply, rape, incest and when a mother’s life is in danger. Both would probably agree that marriage is between a man and a woman and there would be strong support for civil unions.  Yes, when it comes to core values, Democrats and Republicans have much in common.  Politically, both of them support the second amendment and if you ask them under what circumstances they support gun control they would probably both agree on the importance of keeping guns out of the hands of criminals. Both would probably own guns and even be avid hunters.  I bet they would both be opposed to higher taxes, with Democrats including fees as taxes. Once upon a time, some Democratic politicians probably thought that the only way they could be elected as democrats was to run on extreme liberal positions, which represented the opinion of the politician but veered far off course of core Democratic values. This led to the perception that all Democrats are liberals.  The liberal label has been unfairly and unjustly used to describe all democrats, and that is just not so. On core social values, Democrats and Republicans share the same core values. Why is this important?  Because once we agree that we share core values, we can get down to discussing serious political issues.  It is time to shake the liberal tag that has never really been representative of the TDP.

Burnt Orange Report: Disaster Recovery: A Path Forward for the TDP and Texas Democrats

Burnt Orange Report: Disaster Recovery: A Path Forward for the TDP and Texas Democrats.

A conversation that began a few days ago has quieted down some, but the message that the TDP needs to be revamped it quite loud. Not everyone agrees that the current leadership has been ineffective, but I think the general consensus is that the party leadership could have done better.

It is time to take a serious look at the TDP infrastructure, the leadership and it is time for democrats to put their friendships aside and make some critical decisions as to how and what will move the party from its stagnate state.

It’s time to move over…

Interview with Richie 6/14/2010

“It’s true that of the 29 statewide offices available, the Texas Democratic Party doesn’t hold a single one. The party’s chairman, Boyd Richie, says it’s legitimate to criticize the Democrats for that — but not to blame him for it.”  

http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/texas-democratic-party/tdp-chair-faces-a-challenge-from-michael-barnes/

Texas Democrats: The Mission: To Undermine

I found this very interesting opinion on the current state of the TDP. It is not anything that I have not heard before, I was just surprised to see it on this particular blog. I do not subscribe to the blog, nor usually agree with anything posted, but this I found interesting…because it does not sound like the typical voice often heard from the blog.

Click to read: http://www.burntorangereport.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=11222

Now, for my two cents…

Texas Democrats: The Mission: To Undermine

“Demolishing what is hopelessly broken, rebuilding from the ground up, and charting an entirely new course forward is our only hope for recovering from this disaster that has been the Texas Democratic Party for the past 15 years.”

I can think of a couple of individuals that have this same message, but for some reason many democrats are just not buying it. The language is elevated, but the message is still the same. And I believe the reason democrats don’t buy the message is because they don’t accept the messenger as acceptable or viable.

Either way, a few people may believe that we do not need to “reinvent the wheel” as drastically as it is proposed by this blogger, and a few more may agree 100% with what he says about tearing down and reconstructing a new party, but the point is, and it is as plain as can be, enough is enough. This blogger, offers some constructive criticism, but are democrats ready for “any” kind of change? I would like to share my two cents of the many experiences that ruffled a few of my feathers. This particular blogger supported Kinky, so if you did not care for Kinky, just look past that…this guy still makes sense.

First of all, friendship and nepotism is a powerful force to reckon with in Texas politics. And these friendships are undermining the party. The leadership has created a party of the status quo. The status quo has got to go!  The status quo gives rise to the “good ole party” and results in confusion. Besides, is it true representation when democrats support ineffective leadership and where personal friendship carries more weight than loyalty or allegiance to the party, to the very values that democrats purportedly share?  I would say no.

I agree, it is time to demolish the ways of old and chart a course that leads to a brighter future for all Texans, but how are we to accomplish this?  More on that specific issue later…

I can commend Richie for his desire to recruit so-called “winnable” candidates, but unfortunately, I want to choose my own candidate from a list of candidates, as do my voting friends. And yes we did discuss the seven gubernatorial candidates in 2010 and we were all disgusted with the lack of support for all the candidates from the TDP, and the various democratic groups, clubs and such. But let me add, I also loath and find insulting, the idea of pairing Hispanic candidates with a white candidate simply to attract the Hispanic vote. And I disagree that we need to do a nationwide search for talent to create a new “culture” for Texas democrats. There are plenty of willing individuals with the tenacity, the fortitude and the commitment to direct the party in the right direction. The question is, are we all interested in going in the same direction, because it is not about finding democrats to run for statewide office, as much as it is about attracting a “preferred” candidate for statewide office.  What you prefer and what I prefer may be difference, hence the Democratic Primaries. This individual does not need to be an attorney, or have a list of endorsements from elected democrats, the same elected democrats that have failed Texans as far as I am concerned. I don’t think we should use endorsements as a qualifying attribute. He or she only has to have leadership skills, a plan and a means of putting that plan into action. He or she must be able to regain the trust of those that matter and at this point, everyone matters.

At this point we need a new chair that will scour the country for the best and brightest young Democrats who have proven success at the state party and/or state caucus level. 

We should commit to a meaningful search for a free agent that can bring new energy, institute a new culture and enact new policies, procedures and strategies to help us move forward (finally).

In this passage you suggest we hire a “free agent” isn’t a free agent simply someone who does the bidding of the highest bidder.  How is that any different than what we have now? We have plenty of talent in Texas…quite astute as to how Texas politics work. The problem is democrats only want to hear from individuals they can identify as viable.

I was at a recent Summit in San Antonio, and I heard much the same messages: we need to bring out the Hispanic vote? The democratic base is not voting. Hispanics tend to vote democrat. At some previous meeting it had been proposed to conduct a nationwide search for someone experienced in Hispanic outreach.  I find it hard to believe that just because Hispanics vote democrat, that makes all Hispanics democrat. They are not necessarily one in the same?

Nevertheless, the talent is there. The talent is ready, but are “you (Texas Democrat)” ready to accept the talent of someone that does not represent your every desire, your image, and your impression of acceptable or viable democratic candidate? That is the question every democrat should be asking themselves.

And by the way, I resent the reference to bright young democrats being the ones that can create change; we should be attracting democrats, and individuals with a passion to do what it takes to create change in Texas.  Then again, there is a huge population of voters D/R that suggest we keep our change.  The 2008 campaign over did it on the change theme. 

You want young. I don’t want young. I want someone who knows where the TDP has been and where it needs to go, and today, it is far from where it needs to be and today’s young democrat is not prepared to get the party where it needs to go. The Democratic Party has a less than an appealing history and it must be remembered so it does not digress from its objective. I tend to believe that is why the party remains fragmented.

As to whether Richie did his best, I would disagree. I say that only because his political director was quite boisterous about the party simply wanting to improve the numbers for a future win. For me that was a reflection of his leadership as was one of the presenters showing up in flip flops, torn jeans and a thin tank top.  Come on! Is that the mind set of someone who wants to win an election, a person who only wants to finish in second place? I am all for getting rid of the whole staff. I have been hearing that message since before Chris Bell. Twenty-ten was going to be year! We must be ready for 2012! Now, it’s 2014. I think his biggest downfall was not being able to create solidarity, or any kind of cohesiveness among democrats or democratic groups, and lack real desire to actually win statewide elections.  And across the state there is too much fragmentation, but much of that fragmentation, as I said, has always existed.

Further, with a fragmented party, it would be unlikely that someone from another part of the country could create a new culture, or change the political landscape in Texas. First, they have to get past the Republican voters. We want to forget that Republicans work of ideology, and that democrats do not. From my observations there is nothing that creates commonality among Texas democrats, democratic groups or democratic voters, not even electing a democratic candidate for president. I cannot express my displeasure upon hearing that Bexar County precinct chairs had resigned after Obama won the Primary; that speaks volume about the influence of the party.

I know people were supportive of what transpired in Bexar County, but Richie should have supported the Bexar County Chair and sought out an amiable resolve rather than joining the lynch party and dragging a county chair through the media mud.  As far as I am concerned, the entire BCDP should be ashamed for trampling over the majority vote. The democratic voters of Bexar County should have been given the opportunity to vote in another or keep the current chair, but instead only a select few were able to vote. The entire incident was a disgrace for democrats and democracy.

I think my biggest beef is with the mentality of the democrats that participated…in reference to asking SDEC members to suggest Richie step down early this was one of the responses.

"when you start slinging "mud" re: "record of indifference" you totally turn me
off. You are beganing to sound like that loudmouth and very vulgar Dan
Ramos formerly the Bexar County Chair till we took a stand and ousted him. If
you want to build any type of following you need to temper your speech." 
Referring to Richie's record as "indifferent" is hardly hostile. Ah, but the power trip that comes from ousting anyone can be intense and give one illusions of unquestionable power.

That is just the way it is. Democrats do not need a new culture; they just need to accept the culture that is Texas. Texas is a growing, very diverse and conservative culture, whether people like it or not. It will take a couple of generations to change it, and it may or may not change. And it is the Hispanic population that is creating a demographic change in Texas. Hispanics, whether people acknowledge it or not, are more traditional, more conservative in family matters, but not completely intolerant. They may accept difference, but might not be quick at acknowledging those differences. And you will find that Hispanics from the south are more influenced by the Hispanic culture because of proximity than Hispanics in northern parts of the state. So there will be differences in how they react to certain situations.

Blogger, I do not agree with all your points, but you are right on target on many of them. That we desperately need a new path forward, perhaps, but we just need to move forward.  Everything democrats have been doing has failed, failed, and failed, as you say, and they will continue to fail if Richie has his way and he has already started.

Your reality check, getting the perfect candidate, finding all the money we need, (there is never enough money for a democrat to get elected) developing a narrative that makes any sense at all, and winning East Texas, well, I totally agree, forget it all. Some democrats are never going to accept certain representation, they will never accept change and they are socializing their children likewise. That is the reality that many Texans and democrats live with, and are determined to change, but they also realize they have an uphill battle.

I don’t believe the Democratic Party knows what their weaknesses are, or that they even have any. So, to chart a new course, to turn the corner and move forward means they need to recognize, confess and identify those weaknesses. For the most part, the TDP leadership, the influence, the deep pockets are still hanging on to their past glory and simply do not want to let go. So, I believe the best place to start evaluating is from the top down and not the bottom up. We know what is at the bottom, but we also know what is on top and it is not going to give up without a real ideological battle.

As I said, people may or may not agree with your opinion, but one thing I always wait for – are the critics, because they will come to tear down anyone who attacks their world view; these critics attack people on personal attributes, rather than reflect on their own beliefs, practices, opinions and such. At this juncture, there does need to be a time of reflection – if – Texas democrats truly want to change the political landscape. But again, unfortunately we have two types of Texas democrats, so which one will make a stronger show of power? Which one will have to compromise so the party can move forward?

There is an old children’s rhyme that seems to fit so adequately with the dilemma facing Texas democrats…

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall;

Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.

All the King’s horses

And all the King’s men

Couldn’t put Humpty together again!

Will this be the fate of the TDP? More later…

For Whom the Bell Tolls: The Texas Democratic Party Chair – Texas Democratic Party, Texas Democratic Party Chair, Felix Alvarado

For Whom the Bell Tolls: The Texas Democratic Party Chair – Texas Democratic Party, Texas Democratic Party Chair, Felix Alvarado.

It’s all about values…

Veteran’s Affairs.

This agency is a severe blight on America’s soul.  Most people acknowledge the veteran, but not all veterans are the same.  I am a disabled veteran.  I am a disabled peacetime veteran.  There are others who are peacetime veterans.  There are those who made the military their career.  These career soldiers served in some war or another, some had more than one combat tour.  Some military people were killed serving their country, others wounded, others just served.  I am one of those that just served.  I had opportunities to be involved in combat but I was fortunate that the enemy never attacked when it was my time to play soldier.  I was exposed to Agent Orange and from what I understand now it was pretty nasty stuff.  My disability was caused in peacetime.  A year ago I was operated for a peacetime injury.  I applied for compensation.  For over a year I have heard VA say “we are working on it”.  Letters to the secretary and the president have not been answered.  When I identify myself as a veteran I hear people say thank you for your service.  I do not want “thanks,” I want someone to make the VA get off its butt.  Is that possible?  Where are the elected officials?  Why aren’t they doing something about the service from the VA?  I also hear, “VA has too much work.”  VA is the most urgent matter that the Congress has.  Where is the Congress?

Last topic is inclusion.  What does the word mean?  How is it practiced?  I have personal experience with the Democratic Party and inclusion.  In my experience it has been more exclusive than inclusive.  When I ran for Congress the first time, county chairs took me under their arm and gave me advice about being a politician.  One piece of advice that they gave me was to get a hold of Martin Frost, find out his schedule and be at all his events.  That was easier said than done.  Or as a pundit explained, “Martin has to see Barton every day.  They are buddies.  Martin is not going to endanger his relationship with Joe to help you”. Then there was the infamous hot check.  As I recall the TDP chair removed my name from the ballot because the check did not clear.  Well this time the check did clear.  However, this time the TDP chair decided that only the anointed one would be the only one welcomed at the county level and all of us were excluded by most county chairs.  Funny thing, the TDP did not return anybody’s check.  The TDP kept the money. So if we are talking about inclusion, transparency, and accountability we need to play with a full deck.  Thus far, the TDP has not played with a full deck.  Manipulating elections favoring some candidates over others is not necessarily democratic.

Four years ago I said that what the Democratic Party needed was leadership.  Today, I repeat my words of four years ago.  What the Democratic Party needs is leadership.  I believe that it is wrong to fabricate some great hope, building everybody’s hopes when the party does not realize that the leadership is out of step with Texas politics.  Old style closed room, cigar chomping people making decisions as to who was going to represent the party, well those days are over.

It is all about values..

I am a Social Studies teacher.  As a Vietnam veteran who lived and experienced the civil rights era, I am witness to a student population that could care less about any trials and tribulations of those who participated in these events.  To many students these events are just footnotes in history.  Most of the parents of today’s student population themselves have no recollection of these historical events.  I grew up in the Westside of San Antonio.  You would think that as a barrio boy I would automatically bond with today’s students.  Not so.

Today’s barrio is much different than the one I grew up in.  I am certain that barrio kids today love their parents, brothers and siblings, that they have barrio friends just as I did.  So what is different?  The values have not changed, what has changed are the circumstances and surroundings.  Many of us grew up hearing “I made it, you can make it.”  Today’s kids are more apt to say, “You made it, I can make it”.

Published in: on April 24, 2011 at 8:20 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,

It is all about values…

For a while I have said that in politics it is all about values.  Values make you a Republican a Democrat or an independent.  Values make a statement about you.  Values establish a bond between people that is hard to dissolve.  If you ask someone to describe a Republican this is what you may get back:

Pro-Life          Pro-Gun          Pro-God          Pro-family      Small government

Low taxes       Anti-abortion                          Balanced budget

Anti-Gay         Strong military                       Pro-business

Ask someone to describe a Democrat and this is what you may get back:

Tax and spend             Pro-abortion

Big government          Weak on military

Big spender                 Anti-second amendment

Keeping in mind that these are merely perceptions.  One of the enduring lessons from my military experience is that perceptions are reality.  Or, as one of my supervisors once said, “don’t confuse me with the facts.”

Democrats against Democracy

This is a clear case of democrats against democracy.

Democrats against Obama…the group was renamed Boot Obama out today (BOOT)…how many Texas democrats are on that list?

It is unbelievable that many Bexar County precinct chairs resigned their positions after Obama won the primary…

Now, San Antonio Democrats and a few Texas Democrats are demanding Dan Ramos resign…and then post such information on the party website…that is nothing short of treacherous. What a great example of how democracy works.

With such a divisive mentality, it makes complete sense why Democrats cannot get anyone elected to statewide office.

Democrats against democracy…huge problem with the TDP.